《2026年水木金卷高考模拟试卷精编英语》

D
Imagine a not-too-distant future, where we each inhabit our own AI-driven digital filter (过滤) bubble, crafted for us alone and designed to serve corporate interests. This future resembles 1998's movie The Truman Show (《楚门的世界》), where the main character unknowingly lived his entire life within a reality TV show designed by a production studio.
One subset of AI, large language models (LLMs), won't turn our lives into reality TV shows. Instead, personalized AI agents threaten to cage each of us in an individualized and illusory (虚假的) unreality, profiting from our digital activities and walling us off from genuine connections. Many companies are developing individualized LLMs. The underlying principle is that AI will learn about the individual user and adapt accordingly. For example, if you're a super fan of a football team, you'll be fed updates, ads, and videos tailored to your interests 24 hours a day. Some algorithms (算法) may even learn your schedule, pushing information at you during precisely those times when you're most likely to be looking.
This may sound harmless. But the next step is to use LLMs to create memes, or even fake articles, feeding you conspiracy (密谋, 阴谋) theories about rival teams. This is a miserable reality for at least two reasons. For one, there are neither computational methods or ethical incentives (激励) in place to ensure that the information you receive is true. But just as frightening as the lack of regard for the truth is an even scarier element. You will no longer live with an accurate understanding of the football team that is fully compatible (兼容的) with anyone else's. You will run on information generated only for yourself. This vision is unsettling, even in sports and entertainment. But what of institutions that have more direct social consequences? Education? Politics?
With the fall of the press and polarization of everything, conversations around the holiday table have already become impossible for many extended families. Bad as the status might be, stranger times lie ahead that make us long for today's echo chambers (信息茧房). Soon, our bubbles will shrink further and further, until our digital worlds involve only ourselves. In an AI-mediated future, everyone will live in a private Truman Show. As a society, we will be completely incapable of making fruitful collective decisions because we will have no shared understanding of the world.
What's the way out? Find your entertainment in spaces with actual people, exchanging thoughts and creations with each other. Even online, we must keep our understanding of the world grounded in human-authored documents and artifacts. Valuing what humans create is not merely a matter of authenticity; it also ensures we focus on arguments that an author cared enough to make, on conservations that speakers cared enough to have.
Otherwise, The Truman Show's premise (假定) becomes our reality, unknowingly inhabiting a fake world where our every experience is designed for profit. Even more existentially alienating? Living in a Truman Show where the director, producer and the only one watching is an AI.
51. The author mentions The Truman Show in Paragraph 1 to .
A. make a comparison
B. illustrate a situation
C. support an argument
D. propose a suggestion
52. According to the passage, personalized AI agents may .
A. isolate individuals in false realities
B. confirm the credibility of the content
C. discourage the companies' ethical incentives
D. improve user behavior by feeding targeted ads
53. What is the main function of individualized LLMs mentioned in the passage?
A. To provide universal and objective information.
B. To learn about users and customize information delivery.
C. To fact-check all the information before pushing.
D. To promote communication among different users.
54. What can be inferred from the passage?
A. Algorithms have raised concerns over privacy.
B. LLMs are in great need of computational upgrade.
C. Echo chambers weaken collective decision-making.
D. Technology development results in polarized society.
55. Which would be the best title for this passage?
A. AI and the Future of Human Interaction
B. AI Might Turn Our Lives into The Truman Show
C. The Truman Show Predicts AI's Impact on Media
D. Algorithmic Bubbles and the Value of Human Creations

答案： 51.B推理判断题。题干意为:作者在第一段提及《楚门的世界》以______。根据第一段中“Imagine a not-too-distant future，where we each inhabit our own AI-driven digital filter(过滤)bubble，crafted for us alone and designed to serve corporate interests. This future resembles 1998’s movie The Truman Show(《楚门的世界》)”可知，在不太遥远的未来，我们每个人都生活在自己的人工智能驱动的数字过滤气泡中，这个气泡是专门为我们打造的，旨在为企业利益服务，而这个未来类似于《楚门的世界》这部电影。由此可推知，作者在第一段提到《楚门的世界》是为了描述一种未来可能的情况，即人们可能会生活在由人工智能驱动的数字过滤气泡中。故选B。
52.A细节理解题。题干意为:根据这篇文章，个性化的人工智能代理可能会______。根据第二段中“personalized AI agents threaten to cage each of us in an individualized and illusory(虚假的)unreality”可知，个性化的人工智能代理可能会将个人孤立在虚假的现实中。故选A。
53.B细节理解题。题干意为:文中提及的个性化大型语言模型的主要功能是什么?根据第二段中“Many companies are developing individualized LLMs. The underlying principle is that AI will learn about the individual user and adapt accordingly.”可知，个性化大型语言模型的基本原则是人工智能将了解个人用户，并进行相应的调整。由此可知，个性化的大型语言模型的主要功能是了解用户并定制信息传递。故选B。
54.C推理判断题。题干意为:可以从这篇文章中推断出什么?根据第四段中“In an AI-mediated future... As a society，we will be completely incapable of making fruitful collective decisions”可知，在人工智能介导的未来，作为一个社会，我们将完全无法做出富有成效的集体决策。由此可推知，信息茧房削弱了集体决策的能力。故选C。
55.B标题归纳题。题干意为:哪一项是这篇文章的最佳标题?通读全文，尤其是第一段内容可知，本文主要介绍了人工智能可能会在不远的未来将我们的生活变成像《楚门的世界》里的生活，那时我们每个人都可能生活在一个由人工智能驱动的数字过滤气泡中，被隔离在虚假的现实中。所以，B项“人工智能可能会将我们的生活变成《楚门的世界》”是本文的最佳标题。故选B。