《2026年水木金卷高考模拟试卷精编英语》

D
Anger is one of the most intense and challenging emotions we experience. It can arise from feelings of injustice, frustration, or perceived threats to our well-being. Whether anger manifests in ourselves or in others, it has the potential to create division, escalate(升级) conflicts, and harm relationships. However, anger does not have to control us. By utilizing compassion—specifically, compassionate reframing—we can transform anger into a deeper understanding and connection.
At its core, anger is a reaction to an appraisal—a mental assessment of a situation that threatens something we value. This appraisal determines the intensity and quality of our emotional response. However, situations themselves do not contain meaning; we assign meaning to them based on our interpretations. When we react in anger, we often view events through a narrow lens, reinforcing negative emotions and rigid perspectives. Reframing is the process of consciously changing our interpretation of an event to reduce negative emotions. Compassionate reframing takes this one step further by integrating compassion—for both ourselves and others—into the way we interpret situations, helping us move away from hostility and resentment toward a mindset of unity and understanding.
Compassion has the power to neutralize anger by softening our perspective. It allows us to acknowledge suffering—both our own and that of others—without immediate judgment or retaliation. We can shift our reactions from aggressive to constructive. Consider a common scenario: You are at a restaurant, and the server has not attended to your table for quite some time. A typical reaction might be: "This is ridiculous! We've been waiting forever. The service here is terrible!" A compassionate reframing might be: "I don't like how long this is taking, but I know serving tables is difficult. Maybe they're short-staffed tonight. At least I can enjoy my time with friends."
Compassionate reframing acknowledges personal discomfort while also extending understanding to the server. It prevents anger from escalating and creates an opportunity to act with patience and kindness. Rather than reacting defensively or dismissively, we can ask ourselves: What might be causing their anger? How can I respond in a way that acknowledges their emotions without fueling hostility?
Anger is an unavoidable part of life, but it does not have to dominate our reactions or relationships. By practicing compassionate reframing, we gain the ability to step back, assess situations with kindness, and respond in ways that promote peace rather than conflict. Whether in personal interactions, professional settings, or moments of frustration with strangers, compassionate reframing offers a powerful tool for transforming anger into understanding. The choice to reframe our perspective not only benefits our emotional well-being but also fosters a world where compassion leads the way in conflict resolution and human connection.
51. Which statement does the author probably agree with on anger?
A. Anger should always be contained in social settings.
B. Anger's impact is greater on oneself than on others.
C. Compassionate reframing is effective only in specific contexts.
D. Anger is a natural response that can be positively channeled.
52. Anger often escalates conflicts due to the fact that _.
A. people prioritize winning over resolving issues
B. fixed interpretations prevent consideration of others
C. anger in its nature ruins relationships
D. anger is an unavoidable part of life
53. Why is compassionate reframing proposed to conduct according to the passage?
A. To reduce negative emotions through a deeper understanding.
B. To acknowledge suffering without judgment and develop sympathy.
C. To rationalize one's dissatisfaction in challenging situations.
D. To minimize the potential of a conflict by controlling emotions.
54. The restaurant scenario illustrates that compassionate reframing can _.
A. encourage beneficial dialogues instead of confrontation
B. decrease the sense of self-awareness during disagreements
C. shift focus from personal frustration to others' circumstances
D. validate annoyance as a justified response to the issue
55. The writer's friend Nathan was driving when another driver cut him off, nearly causing an accident. How shouldn't he respond?
A. He was such an idiot! He could have killed us both!
B. I was scared. But maybe he was rushing to a hospital.
C. Dangerous! Perhaps he's a green hand and misjudged the distance.
D. I'm grateful I'm safe. Everyone should be careful in the morning rush.

答案： D 51.D 推理判断题。题干意为:关于愤怒,作者可能同意哪种说法?根据第一段中“It can arise from feelings of injustice, frustration, or perceived threats to our well-being.”和“By utilizing compassion—specifically, compassionate reframing—we can transform anger into a deeper understanding and connection.”可知,愤怒可能来自于不公平的感觉、沮丧或对我们幸福的威胁,它可以通过富有同情心的思维重建转化为更深刻的理解和联系。由此可推知,作者可能认为愤怒是一种可以被积极引导的自然反应。故选D。
52.B 推理判断题。题干意为:因为 这一事实,愤怒经常将冲突升级。根据第二段中“When we react in anger, we often view events through a narrow lens, reinforcing negative emotions and rigid perspectives.”可知,愤怒会让人们以狭隘的视角看待事件,强化负面情绪和僵化的观点。由此可推知,愤怒常常将冲突升级是因为固定的解读会使人们无法考虑他人。故选B。
53.A 细节理解题。题干意为:根据这篇文章,为什么建议进行有同情心的思维重建?根据第二段中“Compassionate reframing takes this one step further by integrating compassion... into the way we interpret situations, helping us move away from hostility and resentment toward a mindset of unity and understanding.”可知,富有同情心的思维重建将同情心融入到解读方式中,帮人们摆脱敌意和仇恨等负面情绪,从而形成团结、理解的心态。由此可知,该方法可以通过更深刻的理解来减少负面情绪。故选A。
54.C 推理判断题。题干意为:餐厅场景说明有同情心的思维重建可以 。根据第三段中“Consider a common scenario: You are at a restaurant, and the server has not attended to your table for quite some time... A compassionate reframing might be: ‘I don’t like how long this is taking, but I know serving tables is difficult. Maybe they’re short-staffed tonight. At least I can enjoy my time with friends.’”可知,在餐厅里等太久时,有同情心的思维重建会让你在有负面情绪时试着对餐厅服务表示理解。由此可推知,这一场景说明富有同情心的思维重建可以将注意力从个人的沮丧转移到他人的处境上。故选C。
55.A 推理判断题。题干意为:作者的朋友Nathan正在开车,这时另一个司机突然插队,差点引起一场车祸。他不应该如何反应?根据第四段中“Compassionate reframing acknowledges personal discomfort while also extending understanding to the server. It prevents anger from escalating and creates an opportunity to act with patience and kindness.”可知,富有同情心的思维重建会对他人表示理解,并以耐心和善良的方式待人接物,避免愤怒升级。由此可推知,A项“他真是个白痴！他差点杀了我们两个人！”是指责和愤怒的表现,不是有同情心的思维重建的反应。故选A。