《2025年金考卷名师名题单元双测卷高中英语必修第三册译林版》

C
社会热点 The scene looks beautiful, with the sun setting on a summer's day in southwest London. In another shot, the figure is playing with her hair while seated in the stands at Wimbledon. Meet Mia Zelu, the Internet celebrity under whose account these pictures are posted. However, she's an AI creation. She has gained nearly 200,000 followers from just 55 posts on social media, fooling the world.
It may appear harmless fun, but according to the global photography agency Getty Images, it's a big problem. The rapid advancement of AI has made it easier than ever to cheat people online. With a few simple instructions, anyone can create photorealistic images and videos — even with sound. More worrying is that the technology can be used to create illegal material. In many cases, it just wastes everyone's time. One elderly Malaysian couple travelled 4.5 hours across the country to go on a cable ride they saw online, only to find it didn't exist. It was generated(产生) by AI.
But let's get back to Mia Zelu. Thousands of people mistook her as a real figure, despite the account description stating she is an “AI influencer”. This misunderstanding showed the need to clearly label (用标签标明) AI - generated content, warning that Zelu “isn't just a one - off phenomenon”. It echoes findings from VisualGPS research and image testing in Australia and New Zealand.
According to the study, while 69 percent of people could recognize at least one AI image, 95 percent also mistakenly thought real images were AI - generated. It's no surprise that 68 percent of people said they can't tell if an image is AI - generated. This shows the importance of clear labelling for AI - generated content. In fact, 90 percent of consumers agree that maintaining credibility(可信性) is important in the age of AI.
Some companies already label AI content by automatically watermarking AI - edited photos — even for small and harmless changes. The issue boils down to building trust and doing things ethically. The responsibility of telling real content from AI - created content shouldn't rest only on ordinary people. Creators of AI models and users of AI models, whether companies or individuals, play a significant role in promoting clear, fair, and responsible use of AI.
28. Why does the author mention the elderly Malaysian couple?
A. To show the global impact of AI technology.
B. To express pity for their terrible experience.
C. To stress the misleading nature of AI content.
D. To reflect older people's low ability to check facts.
29. What does the underlined word “echoes” in paragraph 3 mean?
A. Challenges.
B. Mirrors.
C. Creates.
D. Replaces.
30. What statement might the author agree with based on the last paragraph?
A. AI use requires shared responsibility.
B. Traditional content will be replaced soon.
C. Schools should teach digital literacy skills.
D. Guidelines for AI competition are necessary.
31. What can be a suitable title for the text?
A. AI Content: Why Clear Labelling Matters Online
B. Generative AI: How It's Changing Social Media
C. Virtual Influencers: The Rise of Digital Celebrities
D. Ethical AI: Balancing Creativity and Responsibility

答案： 28.C 推理判断题。根据第二段的“In many cases, it just wastes everyone’s time... it didn’t exist”可知,一对年迈夫妇因AI生成的虚假内容而徒劳奔波,故作者提到这对马来西亚夫妇是为了说明AI生成的内容可能会误导人们,导致人们浪费时间和精力,突出了AI在网络上传播虚假信息时的误导性。
29.B 词义猜测题。画线词前的“Thousands of people mistook her as a real figure”和“Zelu ‘isn’t just a one-off phenomenon’”可知,Zelu被误以为是真人并非偶然的孤立事件,而是一个普遍现象。而第四段的研究发现用调查数据表明,确实有很多人无法分辨AI内容。由此可知,此处指Mia Zelu的例子与研究发现相吻合,都反映了相同的问题,即AI内容容易误导大众、需清晰标注。echo意为“与……相似”,故选B项。
30.A 细节理解题。最后一段明确提到,区分真实内容与AI生成内容的责任不应仅由普通人承担,AI模型创造者和用户需共同促进透明、公平和负责任的AI使用。故作者可能同意“AI使用需要共同责任”的观点。
31.A 标题判断题。全文围绕AI生成内容的误导性(如Mia Zelu案例、马来西亚夫妇事例)及由此引发的信任问题展开,强调清晰标注AI生成内容的必要性(研究数据、消费者观点、企业实践均支持此论点)。A项紧扣这一核心。B项“生成式AI：它如何改变社交媒体”和C项“虚拟网红：数字明星的崛起”偏离文章重心,D项“有道德的AI：平衡创造性与责任”虽相关但未突出“标注”这一关键解决方案。