第159页
- 第1页
- 第2页
- 第3页
- 第4页
- 第5页
- 第6页
- 第7页
- 第8页
- 第9页
- 第10页
- 第11页
- 第12页
- 第13页
- 第14页
- 第15页
- 第16页
- 第17页
- 第18页
- 第19页
- 第20页
- 第21页
- 第22页
- 第23页
- 第24页
- 第25页
- 第26页
- 第27页
- 第28页
- 第29页
- 第30页
- 第31页
- 第32页
- 第33页
- 第34页
- 第35页
- 第36页
- 第37页
- 第38页
- 第39页
- 第40页
- 第41页
- 第42页
- 第43页
- 第44页
- 第45页
- 第46页
- 第47页
- 第48页
- 第49页
- 第50页
- 第51页
- 第52页
- 第53页
- 第54页
- 第55页
- 第56页
- 第57页
- 第58页
- 第59页
- 第60页
- 第61页
- 第62页
- 第63页
- 第64页
- 第65页
- 第66页
- 第67页
- 第68页
- 第69页
- 第70页
- 第71页
- 第72页
- 第73页
- 第74页
- 第75页
- 第76页
- 第77页
- 第78页
- 第79页
- 第80页
- 第81页
- 第82页
- 第83页
- 第84页
- 第85页
- 第86页
- 第87页
- 第88页
- 第89页
- 第90页
- 第91页
- 第92页
- 第93页
- 第94页
- 第95页
- 第96页
- 第97页
- 第98页
- 第99页
- 第100页
- 第101页
- 第102页
- 第103页
- 第104页
- 第105页
- 第106页
- 第107页
- 第108页
- 第109页
- 第110页
- 第111页
- 第112页
- 第113页
- 第114页
- 第115页
- 第116页
- 第117页
- 第118页
- 第119页
- 第120页
- 第121页
- 第122页
- 第123页
- 第124页
- 第125页
- 第126页
- 第127页
- 第128页
- 第129页
- 第130页
- 第131页
- 第132页
- 第133页
- 第134页
- 第135页
- 第136页
- 第137页
- 第138页
- 第139页
- 第140页
- 第141页
- 第142页
- 第143页
- 第144页
- 第145页
- 第146页
- 第147页
- 第148页
- 第149页
- 第150页
- 第151页
- 第152页
- 第153页
- 第154页
- 第155页
- 第156页
- 第157页
- 第158页
- 第159页
- 第160页
- 第161页
- 第162页
- 第163页
- 第164页
- 第165页
- 第166页
- 第167页
- 第168页
- 第169页
- 第170页
- 第171页
- 第172页
- 第173页
- 第174页
- 第175页
- 第176页
- 第177页
- 第178页
- 第179页
- 第180页
D
Have you ever taken a photo with a tiger in a zoo? When you travel around Southeast Asia, are you hoping to ride an elephant? Well, TripAdvisor said this month that they would no longer sell tickets for these kinds of wildlife activities. TripAdvisor is one of the world's busiest travel websites.
The University of Oxford's Wildlife Conservation Research Unit published (出版) a study last year. It said that these activities were bad for animals. When people make elephants carry visitors, they often beat them with sticks (棍子). People also drug (下药) tigers and lions to make them safer for tourists to stay with.
"This animal abuse (虐待) is a hidden by - product (副产品) of the tourism industry (旅游业)," said Steve McIvor, CEO of World Animal Protection. According to the Oxford study, wildlife attractions take up 20 to 40 percent of all tourism worldwide. Up to 6 million people visit these attractions each year. As many as 4 million tourists spend money on these wildlife activities. Without this money, these activities would stop running.
However, the study also found that many of these tourists are actually animal lovers. About 80 percent of them didn't know that these activities weren't good for the animals. Tourists aren't very good at telling whether a wildlife attraction is humane (人道的) or not, said the study.
"That's why it's so important for TripAdvisor to end its sales of the wildlife activities. It sends a message that taking photos with tigers or riding elephants is not something you should do," said McIvor.
()15. What is TripAdvisor?
A. It is a zoo.
B. It is an animal activity.
C. It is a travel group.
D. It is a travel website.
()16. The underlined word "It" in the second paragraph refers to .
A. the University of Oxford
B. Wildlife Conservation Research Unit
C. the study
D. TripAdvisor
()17. How many people visit wildlife attractions every year?
A. 20 million.
B. 6 million.
C. 4 million.
D. 80 million.
()18. Why will TripAdvisor stop selling tickets for wildlife activities?
A. They can't make much money from wildlife activities.
B. TripAdvisor wants to do business in other areas.
C. It is dangerous for people to take wildlife activities.
D. Those activities are bad for wildlife animals.
Have you ever taken a photo with a tiger in a zoo? When you travel around Southeast Asia, are you hoping to ride an elephant? Well, TripAdvisor said this month that they would no longer sell tickets for these kinds of wildlife activities. TripAdvisor is one of the world's busiest travel websites.
The University of Oxford's Wildlife Conservation Research Unit published (出版) a study last year. It said that these activities were bad for animals. When people make elephants carry visitors, they often beat them with sticks (棍子). People also drug (下药) tigers and lions to make them safer for tourists to stay with.
"This animal abuse (虐待) is a hidden by - product (副产品) of the tourism industry (旅游业)," said Steve McIvor, CEO of World Animal Protection. According to the Oxford study, wildlife attractions take up 20 to 40 percent of all tourism worldwide. Up to 6 million people visit these attractions each year. As many as 4 million tourists spend money on these wildlife activities. Without this money, these activities would stop running.
However, the study also found that many of these tourists are actually animal lovers. About 80 percent of them didn't know that these activities weren't good for the animals. Tourists aren't very good at telling whether a wildlife attraction is humane (人道的) or not, said the study.
"That's why it's so important for TripAdvisor to end its sales of the wildlife activities. It sends a message that taking photos with tigers or riding elephants is not something you should do," said McIvor.
()15. What is TripAdvisor?
A. It is a zoo.
B. It is an animal activity.
C. It is a travel group.
D. It is a travel website.
()16. The underlined word "It" in the second paragraph refers to .
A. the University of Oxford
B. Wildlife Conservation Research Unit
C. the study
D. TripAdvisor
()17. How many people visit wildlife attractions every year?
A. 20 million.
B. 6 million.
C. 4 million.
D. 80 million.
()18. Why will TripAdvisor stop selling tickets for wildlife activities?
A. They can't make much money from wildlife activities.
B. TripAdvisor wants to do business in other areas.
C. It is dangerous for people to take wildlife activities.
D. Those activities are bad for wildlife animals.
答案:
15. D
16. C
17. B
18. D
16. C
17. B
18. D
查看更多完整答案,请扫码查看