2025年一遍过高中英语选择性必修第一册北师大版
注:目前有些书本章节名称可能整理的还不是很完善,但都是按照顺序排列的,请同学们按照顺序仔细查找。练习册 2025年一遍过高中英语选择性必修第一册北师大版 答案主要是用来给同学们做完题方便对答案用的,请勿直接抄袭。
第4页
- 第1页
- 第2页
- 第3页
- 第4页
- 第5页
- 第6页
- 第7页
- 第8页
- 第9页
- 第10页
- 第11页
- 第12页
- 第13页
- 第14页
- 第15页
- 第16页
- 第17页
- 第18页
- 第19页
- 第20页
- 第21页
- 第22页
- 第23页
- 第24页
- 第25页
- 第26页
- 第27页
- 第28页
- 第29页
- 第30页
- 第31页
- 第32页
- 第33页
- 第34页
- 第35页
- 第36页
- 第37页
- 第38页
- 第39页
- 第40页
- 第41页
- 第42页
- 第43页
- 第44页
- 第45页
- 第46页
- 第47页
- 第48页
- 第49页
- 第50页
- 第51页
- 第52页
- 第53页
- 第54页
- 第55页
- 第56页
- 第57页
- 第58页
- 第59页
- 第60页
- 第61页
- 第62页
- 第63页
- 第64页
- 第65页
- 第66页
- 第67页
- 第68页
B
主题语境:人与社会 语篇类型:议论文 难度:难 建议用时:8 分钟
In his 1936 work How to Win Friends and Influence People, Dale Carnegie wrote: "I have come to the conclusion that there is only one way to get the best of an argument — and that is to avoid it." This distaste for arguments is common, but it depends on a mistaken view of arguments that causes problems for our personal and social lives — and in many ways misses the point of arguing in the first place.
Carnegie would be right if arguments were fights, which is how we often think of them. Like physical fights, verbal (言语的) fights can leave both sides bloodied. Even when you win, you end up no better off. You would feel almost as bad if arguments were even just competitions — like, say, tennis tournaments. Pairs of opponents hit the ball back and forth until one winner comes out from all who entered. Everybody else loses. This kind of thinking explains why so many people try to avoid arguments.
However, there are ways to win an argument every time. When you state your position, formulate (阐述) an argument for what you claim and honestly ask yourself whether your argument is any good. When you talk with someone who takes a stand, ask them to give you a reason for their view and spell out their argument fully. Assess its strength and weakness. Raise objections (异议) and listen carefully to their replies. This method will require effort, but practice will make you better at it.
These tools can help you win every argument — not in the unhelpful sense of beating your opponents but in the better sense of learning about what divides people, learning why they disagree with us and learning to talk and work together with them. If we readjust our view of arguments — from a verbal fight or tennis game to a reasoned exchange through which we all gain respect and understanding from each other — then we change the very nature of what it means to "win" an argument.
5. What is the author's attitude toward Carnegie's understanding of argument?
A. Critical.
B. Supportive.
C. Tolerant.
D. Uncertain.
6. Why do many people try to avoid arguments?
A. They lack debating skills.
B. They fear being ignored.
C. They may feel bad even if they win.
D. They are not confident in themselves.
7. What does the underlined phrase "spell out" in paragraph 3 probably mean?
A. Defend.
B. Explain.
C. Conclude.
D. Repeat.
8. What is the key to "winning" an argument according to the author?
A. Sense of logic.
B. Proper manners.
C. Solid supporting evidence.
D. Understanding from both sides.
主题语境:人与社会 语篇类型:议论文 难度:难 建议用时:8 分钟
In his 1936 work How to Win Friends and Influence People, Dale Carnegie wrote: "I have come to the conclusion that there is only one way to get the best of an argument — and that is to avoid it." This distaste for arguments is common, but it depends on a mistaken view of arguments that causes problems for our personal and social lives — and in many ways misses the point of arguing in the first place.
Carnegie would be right if arguments were fights, which is how we often think of them. Like physical fights, verbal (言语的) fights can leave both sides bloodied. Even when you win, you end up no better off. You would feel almost as bad if arguments were even just competitions — like, say, tennis tournaments. Pairs of opponents hit the ball back and forth until one winner comes out from all who entered. Everybody else loses. This kind of thinking explains why so many people try to avoid arguments.
However, there are ways to win an argument every time. When you state your position, formulate (阐述) an argument for what you claim and honestly ask yourself whether your argument is any good. When you talk with someone who takes a stand, ask them to give you a reason for their view and spell out their argument fully. Assess its strength and weakness. Raise objections (异议) and listen carefully to their replies. This method will require effort, but practice will make you better at it.
These tools can help you win every argument — not in the unhelpful sense of beating your opponents but in the better sense of learning about what divides people, learning why they disagree with us and learning to talk and work together with them. If we readjust our view of arguments — from a verbal fight or tennis game to a reasoned exchange through which we all gain respect and understanding from each other — then we change the very nature of what it means to "win" an argument.
5. What is the author's attitude toward Carnegie's understanding of argument?
A. Critical.
B. Supportive.
C. Tolerant.
D. Uncertain.
6. Why do many people try to avoid arguments?
A. They lack debating skills.
B. They fear being ignored.
C. They may feel bad even if they win.
D. They are not confident in themselves.
7. What does the underlined phrase "spell out" in paragraph 3 probably mean?
A. Defend.
B. Explain.
C. Conclude.
D. Repeat.
8. What is the key to "winning" an argument according to the author?
A. Sense of logic.
B. Proper manners.
C. Solid supporting evidence.
D. Understanding from both sides.
答案:
1. A
2. C
3. B
4. D
2. C
3. B
4. D
查看更多完整答案,请扫码查看